You are currently viewing Author vs. AI Jane Friedman’s Stand Against Amazon’s Book Attribution
Unveiling AI's Literary Impersonation: The Case of Jane Friedman and Amazon

Author vs. AI Jane Friedman’s Stand Against Amazon’s Book Attribution

In a perplexing turn of events, Amazon has been compelled to remove five books from its platform that were erroneously attributed to author Jane Friedman. Friedman, a seasoned writer who has explored the intricacies of the publishing world, found herself embroiled in a clash with Amazon over the misattribution of these titles. The crux of the matter lay in the fact that she hadn’t trademarked her own name.

Friedman’s disheartening ordeal began when she stumbled upon these books for sale on Amazon. To her dismay, they bore her name as their authorship. In her view, these works seemed to have originated from an AI, a notion that resonates with her belief. They had also found their way onto Goodreads, a review site owned by Amazon.

Jane Friedman When AI Writes in Your Name

Venting her frustration, Friedman candidly expressed, “It feels like a violation, because it’s really low-quality material with my name on it.” Her extensive body of work in the publishing sector was the unwitting template for these false creations. Among the spurious titles that appeared were “How to Write and Publish an eBook Quickly and Make Money” and “A Step-by-Step Guide to Crafting Compelling eBooks, Building a Thriving Author Platform, and Maximizing Profitability.” Contrasting these were her authentic contributions such as “The Business of Being a Writer” and “Publishing 101.”

The blurb of one falsely attributed book proclaimed, “This book offers practical strategies, tips, and techniques to help writers streamline their writing process, accelerate their eBook publication timeline, and maximize their earning potential.”

The initial alarm was sounded by a vigilant reader who stumbled upon these spurious listings. They promptly alerted Friedman, leading her to lament, “It looks terrible. It makes me look like I’m trying to take advantage of people with really crappy books.”

Having an intimate understanding of AI tools like ChatGPT, designed to replicate human responses, Friedman’s suspicions were aroused after a brief perusal of these books. She mused, “I’ve been blogging since 2009 – there’s a lot of my content publicly available for training AI models,” a thought shared on her personal website.

Friedman believed that these books were “if not wholly generated by AI, then at least mostly generated by AI.” Driven to action, she swiftly sought ways to remove these titles. A formal complaint was lodged with Amazon, a claim that was met with resistance. Her lack of a trademarked name served as a roadblock to their removal, according to Amazon’s response.

However, as fortune would have it, the books were taken down from both Amazon and Goodreads by Tuesday. Friedman’s vocal outcry on social media is suspected to be the catalyst for this resolution. She issued a clarion call for Amazon to implement protective policies against unsanctioned uploads, all the while advocating for mechanisms to validate authorship.

Instances of fraudulent titles infiltrating Amazon’s listings have cast shadows in the past. One instance involved business writer Patrick Reames, who disclosed a scammer’s use of his social security number to publish a book under his name.

When prompted for insight into Friedman’s predicament, an Amazon spokesperson offered reassurance, affirming, “We have clear content guidelines governing which books can be listed for sale and promptly investigate any book when a concern is raised. We invest heavily to provide a trustworthy shopping experience and to protect customers and authors from misuse of our services.”

In the grander scheme, there’s a poignant reminder that quality journalism shouldn’t be taken for granted. Many individuals worldwide lack the means to access news. It’s this very notion that drives the Guardian’s commitment to keeping journalism accessible, particularly in regions like India. While the option to read for free remains open, those with the capacity are encouraged to support the Guardian’s three-fold mission.

This mission involves empowering quality investigative journalism, acting as a vigilant force in a world where the influential often go unchecked. An added benefit is the independence from billionaire influence, ensuring that reporting remains uncompromised. The affordability of contributing, coupled with its minimal time requirement, makes supporting the Guardian an impactful endeavor. With a small monthly commitment, as low as $2, you can shape the future of open, independent journalism. A mere minute is all it takes to make a significant difference. The Guardian’s gratitude for your contribution is immeasurable.

Leave a Reply